Skip over navigation

Journal Issue: Special Education for Students with Disabilities Volume 6 Number 1 Spring 1996

Effectiveness of Special Education: Is Placement the Critical Factor?
Anne M. Hocutt


  1. Special ed's special costs. The Wall Street Journal. October 20, 1993, at A14.
  2. Shapiro, J.P., Loeb, P., Bowermaster, D., et al. Separate and unequal: How special education programs are cheating our children and costing taxpayers billions each year. U.S. News and World Report. December 13, 1993, at 46–49, 54–56, 60.
  3. Fuchs, D., and Fuchs, L.S. What's "special" about special education? Phi Delta Kappan (March 1995) 76,7:522–30.
  4. Deno, E. Special education as developmental capital. Exceptional Children (1970) 37:229–37. Deno coined the term "cascade of services," now generally referred to as the "continuum of services."
  5. Office of Special Education Programs. Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Sixteenth annual report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, 1994.
  6. Current data show a very slight increase in the percentage of special education students served either totally in general education classes or in general education and special education resource rooms, from 69.0% in the 1985-86 school year to 71.2% in 1991–92. Concomitantly, there is a very slight decrease in the percentage of students served in separate special education classes, from 24.4% in 1985-86 to 23.5% in 1991–92.
  7. Vaughn, S., and Schumm, J.S. Responsible inclusion for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities (May 1995) 28,5:264–70. Additions made by A. Hocutt for this publication.
  8. The Association for persons with Severe Handicaps. TASH resolutions and policy statement. Seattle, WA: TASH, 1991.
  9. Council for Exceptional Children. CEC policy on inclusive schools and community settings. Reston, VA: CEC, 1993.
  10. Council of Administrators for Special Education. Position article on delivery of services to students with disabilities. Albuquerque, NM: CASE, 1994.
  11. National Association of State Boards of Education. Special education: New questions in an era of reform. Alexandria, VA: NASBE, 1993.
  12. National Education Association. Appropriate inclusion. Washington, DC: NEA, 1994.
  13. Consumer Action Network of, by, and for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Americans. Position statement on full inclusion. Washington, DC: Consumer Action Network, 1994.
  14. Council for Learning Disabilities. Concerns about the full inclusion of students with learning disabilities in regular education classrooms. Washington, DC: CLD, 1993.
  15. Division for Learning Disabilities of the Council for Exceptional Children. Inclusion: What does it mean for students with learning disabilities? Reston, VA: DLD, 1996.
  16. Learning Disabilities Association of America. Position article on full inclusion of all students with learning disabilities in the regular education classroom. Washington, DC: LDAA, 1993.
  17. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. A reaction to full inclusion: A reaffirmation of the right of students with learning disabilities to a continuum of services. Washington, DC: NJCLD, 1993.
  18. American Council of the Blind, et al. Full inclusion of students who are blind and visually impaired: A position statement. Washington, DC: ACB, 1993.
  19. American Federation of Teachers. American Federation of Teachers resolution: Inclusion of students with disabilities. Washington, DC: AFT, 1993.
  20. National Education Association, Council for Exceptional Children, and American Association of School Administrators. NEA-CEC-AASA statement on the relationship between special education and general education. Washington, DC: NEA-CEC-AASA, 1987.
  21. Baker, J.M., and Zigmond, N. Are regular education classes equipped to accommodate students with learning disabilities? Exceptional Children (1990) 56,6:515–27.
  22. Vaughn, S., and Schumm, J.S. Classroom ecologies: Implications for inclusion of students with learning disabilities. In Research on classroom ecologies: Implications for inclusion of children with learning disabilities. D. Speece and B.K. Keogh, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996.
  23. Zigmond, N., Levin, E., and Laurie, T.E. Managing the mainstream: An analysis of teacher attitudes and student performance in mainstream high school programs. Journal of Learning Disabilities (1985) 18,9:535–41.
  24. Semmel, M.I., Abernathy, T.V., Butera, G., and Lesar, S. Teacher perceptions of the regular education initiative. Exceptional Children (1991) 58,1:9–24.
  25. Schumm, J.S., and Vaughn, S. Planning for mainstreamed special education students: Perceptions of general classroom teachers. Exceptionality (1992) 3,2:81–98.
  26. Lloyd, J.W., Kauffman, J.M., Landrum, T.J., and Roe, D.L. Why do teachers refer pupils for special education? An analysis of referral records. Exceptionality (1991) 2,3:115–26.
  27. Algozzine, B., Christenson, S., and Ysseldyke, J.E. Probabilities associated with the referral to placement process. Teacher Education and Special Education (1982) 5:19–23.
  28. Shinn, M.R., Tindal, G.A., and Spira, D.A. Special education referrals as an index of teacher tolerance: Are teachers imperfect tests? Exceptional Children (1987) 54,1:32–40.
  29. Gerber, M.M., and Semmel, M.K. Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist (1984) 29,3:137–48.
  30. Cooper, D.H., and Speece, D.L. Maintaining at-risk children in regular education settings: Initial effects of individual differences and classroom environments. Exceptional Children (1991) 57,2:117–26.
  31. Campbell, N.J., Dobson, J.E., and Bost, J.M. Educator perceptions of behavior problems of mainstreamed students. Exceptional Children (1985) 51:298–303.
  32. Hocutt, A.M., Cox, J.L., and Pelosi, J. The identification and placement of learning disabled, mentally retarded, and emotionally disturbed students: Phase I report. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute, 1984.
  33. Semmel, M.I., Abernathy, T.V., Butera, G., and Lesar, S. Teacher perceptions of the regular education initiative. Exceptional Children (1991) 58,1:9–24.
  34. Rosenshine, B.V. Teaching functions in instructional programs. Elementary School Journal (1983) 83,4:335–52.
  35. Gersten, R., Walker, H., and Darch, D. Relationship between teachers' effectiveness and their tolerance for handicapped students. Exceptional Children (1988) 54,5:433–38.
  36. Landrum, T.J., and Kauffman, J.M. Characteristics of general education teachers perceived as effective by their peers: Implications for inclusion of children with learning and behavioral disorders. Exceptionality (1992) 3,3:147–63.
  37. Nelson, D.M., and Pearson, C.A. Integrating services for children and youth with emotional/behavioral disabilities. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children, 1991.
  38. Hocutt, A., Martin, E., and McKinney, J.D. Historical and legal context of mainstreaming. In The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models. J.W. Lloyd, N.N. Singh, and A.C. Repp, eds. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing Company, 1991.
  39. Kauffman, J.M., Gerber, M.M., and Semmel, M.I. Arguable assumptions underlying the Regular Education Initiative. Journal of Learning Disabilities (1988) 21:6–12.
  40. Gersten, R., Woodward, J. Rethinking the regular education initiative: Focus on the classroom teacher. Remedial and Special Education (1990) 11,3:7–16.
  41. Ysseldyke, J., O'Sulllivan, P.J., Thurlow, M., and Christenson, S. Qualitative differences in reading and math instruction received by handicapped students. Remedial and Special Education (1989) 10,1:14–20.
  42. Kaufman, M., Agard, T.A., and Semmel, M.I. Mainstreaming: Learners and their environment. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books, 1985.
  43. Ysseldyke, J.E., Christenson, S.L., Thurlow, M.L., and Bakewell, D. Are different kinds of instructional tasks used by different categories of students in different settings? School Psychology Review (1988) 1,81:305–11.
  44. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., and Bishop, N. Teacher planning for students with learning disabilities: Differences between general and special educators. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice (1992) 7,3:120–28.
  45. Deno, S., Maruyama, G., Espin, C., and Cohen, C. Educating students with mild disabilities in general education classrooms: Minnesota alternatives. Exceptional Children (1990) 57,2:150–61.
  46. Gottlieb, J., Alter, M., and Gottlieb, B.W. Mainstreaming academically handicapped children in urban schools. In The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models. J.W. Lloyd, N.N. Singh, and A.C. Repp, eds. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing Company, 1991.
  47. Ysseldyke, J.E., Thurlow, M.L., Christenson, S.L., and McVicar, R. Instructional grouping arrangements used with mentally retarded, learning disabled, emotionally disturbed, and nonhandicapped elementary students. Journal of Educational Research (1988) 81:305–11.
  48. Keller, C.E., McKinney, J.D., and Hallahan, D.P. Comparisons between beginning general and special education teachers. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1989.
  49. Nowacek, E.J., McKinney, J.D., and Hallahan, D.P. Instructional behaviors of more and less effective beginning regular and special educators. Exceptional Children (1990) 57,2:140–49.
  50. Lipsky, D.K., and Gartner, A. The current situation. In Beyond separate education: Quality education for all. D.K. Lipsky and A. Gartner, eds. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1989.
  51. Sheehan, R., and Keogh, B.K. Approaches to evaluation in special education. In Advances in special education. Vol. 4. B.K. Keogh, ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984.
  52. Epps, S., and Tindal, G. The effectiveness of differential programming in serving students with mild handicaps: Placement options and instructional programming. In The Handbook of Special Education. Vol. 1. M.C. Wang, M.C. Reynolds, and H.J. Walberg, eds. New York: Pergamon Press, 1987.
  53. Stainback, S., and Stainback, W. Integration of students with mild and moderate handicaps. In Beyond separate education: Quality education for all. D.K. Lipsky and A. Gartner, eds. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1989.
  54. Hallahan, D.P., Keller, C.E., McKinney, J.D., et al. Examining the research base of the regular education initiative: Efficacy studies and the Adaptive Learning Environments Model. Journal of Learning Disabilities (1988) 21,1:29–35.
  55. Heller, K.A., Holtzman, S.H., and Messick, S. Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1982.
  56. Carlberg, C., and Kavale, K. The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education (1980) 14:295–309.
  57. Wang, M.C., and Baker, E.T. Mainstreaming programs: Design features and effects. Journal of Special Education (1985-86) 19,4:503–26.
  58. Sindelar, P.T., and Deno, S.L. The effectiveness of resource programming. Journal of Special Education (1979) 12:17–28.
  59. Leinhardt, G., and Pallay, A. Restrictive educational settings: Exile or haven? Review of Educational Research (1982) 52,4:557–78.
  60. Marston, D. The effectiveness of special education: A time-series analysis of reading performance in regular and special education settings. Journal of Special Education (1987–88) 27:466–80.
  61. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., and Fernstrom, P. A conservative approach to special education reform: Mainstreaming through transenvironmental programming and curriculum-based measurement. American Education Research Journal (1993) 30:149–77.
  62. Donahoe, K., and Zigmond, N. Academic grades of ninth-grade urban learning-disabled students and low-achieving peers. Exceptionality (1990) 1,1:17–28.
  63. Zigmond, N., and Kerr, M.M. Managing the mainstream: A contrast of the behaviors of learning disabled students who pass their assigned mainstream courses and those who fail. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association. Chicago, IL, 1985.
  64. Wang, M.C., and Birch, J.W. Effective special education in regular classes. Exceptional Children (1984) 50:391–98.
  65. Bear, G.G., Clever, A., and Proctor, W.A. Self-perceptions of nonhandicapped children and children with learning disabilities in integrated classes. Journal of Special Education (1991) 24,2:409–26.
  66. Renick, M.J., and Harter, S. Impact of social comparisons on the developing self-perceptions of learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology (1989) 81:631–38.
  67. Coleman, J.M. Self concept and the mildly handicapped: The role of social comparisons. Journal of Special Education (1983) 17:37–45.
  68. Kauffman, J.M., Lloyd, J.W., and McGee, K.A. Adaptive and maladaptive behavior: Teachers' attitudes and their technical assistance needs. Journal of Special Education (1989) 23,3:85–200.
  69. Wagner, M. Outcomes for youths with serious emotional disturbance in secondary school and early adulthood. The Future of Children (Summer/Fall 1995) 5,2:90–112.
  70. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Fernstrom, P., and Hohn, M. Toward a responsible reintegration of behaviorally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders (1991) 16:133–47.
  71. Swanson, J.M., McBurnett, K., Wigal, T., et al. The effect of stimulant medication on ADD children: A "review of reviews." Exceptional Children (1993) 60:154–62.
  72. Lowenbraun, S., and Thompson, M. Environments and strategies for learning and teaching. In Handbook of special education: Research and practice. Vol. 3. M.C. Wang, M.C. Reynolds, and H.J. Walberg, eds. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1989.
  73. Pflaster, G. A factor-analysis of variables related to academic performance of hearing-impaired children in regular classes. Volta Review (1980) 82,2:71–84.
  74. Liben, L.S. Developmental perspectives on the experiential deficiencies of deaf children. Deaf children: Developmental perspectives. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
  75. Brinker, R.P., and Thorpe, M.E. Features of integrated educational ecologies that predict social behavior among severely mentally retarded and nonretarded students. American Journal of Mental Deficiency (1986) 91,2:150–59.
  76. Thousand, J.S., and Villa, R.A. Strategies for educating learners with severe disabilities within their local home schools and communities. Focus on Exceptional Children (1990) 23,3:4–24.
  77. Affleck, J.Q., Madge, S., Adams, A., and Lowenbraun, S. Integrated classroom versus resource model: Academic viability and effectiveness. Exceptional Children (1988) 54,4:339–48.
  78. Bear, G.G., and Proctor, W.A. Impact of a full-time integrated program on the achievement of nonhandicapped and mildly handicapped children. Exceptionality (1990) 1,4:227–37.
  79. Baker, J., and Zigmond, N. Mainstreaming learning disabled students: The impact on regular education students and teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association. Boston, MA, 1990.
  80. York, J., Vandercook, T., Macdonald, C., et al. Feedback about integrating middle school students with severe disabilities in general education classes. Exceptional Children (1992) 58,3:244–58.
  81. Semmel, M.I., Gerber, M.M., and Macmillan, D.L. Twenty-five years after Dunn's article: A legacy of policy analysis research in special education. The Journal of Special Education (1994) 27:481–95.
  82. Carter, J., and Sugai, G. Survey on prereferral practices: Responses from state departments of education. Exceptional Children (1989) 55,4:298–302.
  83. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Dulan, J.U., et al. Where is the research on consultation effectiveness? Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation (1992) 3,2:151–74.
  84. Chalfant, J.C., Pysh, M.V., and Moultrie, R. Teacher assistance teams: A model for within-building problem solving. Learning Disability Quarterly (1979) 2,3:85–96.
  85. Johnson, L.J., and Pugach, M.C. Peer collaboration: Accommodating students with mild learning and behavior problems. Exceptional Children (1991) 57,5:454–61.
  86. Fuchs, D., and Fuchs, L.S. Exploring effective and efficient prereferral interventions: A component analysis of Behavioral Consultation. School Psychology Review (1989) 18:260–83.
  87. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., and Bahr, M.W. Mainstream assistance teams: A scientific basis for the art of consultation. Exceptional Children (1990) 57,2:128–39.
  88. Buffmire, J.A. Special education delivery alternatives: Change over time in teacher ratings, self-image, perceived classroom climate, and academic achievement among handicapped and non-handicapped children. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 140 565. Salt Lake City, UT: Southwest Regional Resources Center, 1977.
  89. Miller, T.L., and Sabatino, D.A. An evaluation of the teacher consultant model as an approach to mainstreaming. Exceptional Children (1978) 45:86–91.
  90. Schulte, A.C., Osborne, S.S., and McKinney, J.D. Academic outcomes for students with learning disabilities in consultation and resource programs. Exceptional Children (1990) 57,2:162–72.
  91. Cantrell, R.P., and Cantrell, M.L. Preventive mainstreaming: Impact of a supportive services program on pupils. Exceptional Children (1976) 42:381–86.
  92. Knight, M.F., Meyers, H.W., Paolucci-Whitcomb, P., et al. A four-year evaluation of consulting teacher service. Behavioral Disorders (1981) 6:92–100.
  93. White, W.A.T. A meta-analysis of the effects of Direct Instruction in special education. Education and Treatment of Children (1988) 11:364–74.
  94. Gersten, R., Carnine, D., and Williams, P. Measuring implementation of a structured educational model in an urban setting: An observational approach. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (1982) 4,1:67–79.
  95. Slavin, R.E., and Stevens, R.J. Cooperative learning and mainstreaming. In The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues and models. J.W. Lloyd, N.N. Singh, and A.C. Repp, eds. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing Company, 1991.
  96. Slavin, R.E. Team assisted individualization: Cooperative learning and individualized instruction in the mainstreamed classroom. Remedial and Special Education (1984) 5,6:33–42.
  97. Slavin, R.E., Stevens, R.J., and Madden, N.A. Accommodating student diversity in reading and writing instruction: A cooperative learning approach. Remedial and Special Education (1988) 9,1:60–66.
  98. Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T. Learning together and alone, 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987.
  99. Madden, N.A., and Slavin, R.E. Effects of cooperative learning on the social acceptance of mainstreamed academically handicapped students. Journal of Special Education (1983) 17,2:171–82.
  100. Research Triangle Institute. Approaches and options for integrating students with disabilities. Longmont, CO: Sopris West, 1993.
  101. Cook, S.B., Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., and Casto, G.C. Handicapped students as tutors. Journal of Special Education (1985–86) 19,4:483–91.
  102. Hallahan, D.P., and Bryan, T.H. Learning disabilities. Handbook of special education. J.M. Kauffman and D.P. Hallahan, eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1981.
  103. Deshler, D.D., and Schumaker, J.B. An instructional model for teaching students how to learn. In Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students. J.E. Zins and M.J. Curtis, eds. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists, 1988, pp. 391–412.
  104. Bulgren, J.A., Schumaker, J.B., and Deshler, D.D. Effectiveness of a concept teaching routine in enhancing the performance of LD students in secondary-level mainstream classes. Learning Disability Quarterly (1988) 11,1:3–17.
  105. Anderson-Inman, L. Bridging the gap: Student-centered strategies for promoting the transfer of learning. Exceptional Children (1986) 52:562–72.
  106. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., and Fernstrom, P. Case-by-case reintegration of students with learning disabilities. Elementary School Journal (1992) 92,3:261–82.
  107. Fuchs, D., Kempsey, S., Roberts, H., and Kintsch, A. School reintegration. In Best practices in school psychology. Vol. 3. J. Grimes and A. Thomas, eds. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists, 1996, pp. 879–92.
  108. Zigmond, N., Jenkins, J., Fuchs, L., et al. Special education in restructured schools: Findings from three multi-year studies. Phi Delta Kappan (1995) 76,7:531–40.